UID:612
UID:1622
UID:511
UID:626
以下是引用无形在2003-9-5 14:22:14的发言:看不出来必然联系
以下是引用李清在2003-9-5 16:06:33的发言:“乡镇人民政府一律改为县政府乡镇办事处,为派出机构” 换个牌子?
UID:156
UID:64
UID:512
UID:620
UID:964
UID:1087
UID:293
以下是引用QQme在2003-9-17 20:15:45的发言:撤来撤去,不过是拆东墙补西墙的方法,不从体制上做改革,永远走不出这个怪圈。
UID:68
以下是引用北极星在2003-9-20 17:37:15的发言:[quote]以下是引用QQme在2003-9-17 20:15:45的发言: 撤来撤去,不过是拆东墙补西墙的方法,不从体制上做改革,永远走不出这个怪圈。
UID:1045
以下是引用QQme在2003-9-21 1:14:19的发言: 他撤了乡镇,必定设区共所。使乡镇更加不完整,这个县域的农村建设全部集中到县城,造成县城集权空前加强,不好。 其实台湾也有乡镇,日本有町村,规模都相当于大陆的乡镇。所以乡镇作为基层政权还是很合适的。如果说有是农民无法承受的地方,那是政治体制问题,和区划无关。
UID:10687
UID:1717
以下是引用wangkan2001在2002-11-5 3:53:00的发言:Why they must be supported by farmers?Goverment is not Church which give you free food and clothes!Farmers are very very poor, they should not be robbed any more!
What a serious Chiglish(汉式英语)!the exact expression is "Why must they be raised by peasants?The governments should not be the church that only receives free savages, such as cash and clothes! In China,the peasants are still very poor,therefore,they should not be always robbed!"