查了wikipedia，看來正名運動還沒跑完程序：
The Pretoria name change process
On 5 December 2000 a number of old Pretoria municipalities as well as others that fell outside the Greater Pretoria area were combined into one metropolitan area called The City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality. The city of Pretoria remained largely intact within this municipality. The debate around the possible name change of the city of Pretoria raged ever since.
On the 26 May 2005 the South African Geographical Names Council unanimously approved a recommendation by the Tshwane Metro Council that the name Pretoria be changed to Tshwane. [7]
The legal process involved is as follows:
Recommendation to the Geographical Names Council.
Council approves / rejects recommendation (Approved - 26 May 2005).
Council gives its recommendation to Arts and Culture Minister Pallo Jordan.
Minister approves / rejects recommendation.
Approved / rejected name is published in the Government Gazette.
Any person or body unhappy with the name change can complain within 1 month of above.
The minister can consult the Geographical Names Council with concerns raised.
The minister's decision, along with the reasons for it, are published
The minister will then take the matter before parliament where the central government will decide on whether to change the name or not based on the information before it.
Some controversial groups have attached themselves to the Pretoria name-change issue, including the trade union Solidarity [8]]. Solidarity and the Pretoria Civil Action Committee have threatened legal action should the name change be recommended by the minister.
As of November 2007 the name change has not yet been approved or rejected by the minister (step 4 above).
Early August 2007, it was reported in the press that the Municipality, after consulting with the Gauteng provincial government had withdrawn the application to change the name, and was instead contemplating a plan to change all road signs pointing to "Pretoria", to "Tshwane" or the "City of Tshwane" across the country. This plan raised threats of legal action from both political groupings opposed to the renaming, and concerns from municipal officials about the possibility of vandalism to the proposed road signs. [9] [10]. Later reports appeared to contradict these claims, to some extent [11].
